Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli answers turbine questions

Business | Featured | Front Page | News.

wind turbines and lines

Editor’s note: The Independent recently requested an interview with Ontario Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli about the concerns about industrial wind turbines. We submitted five questions and here are the unedited responses forwarded by the minister’s office.

When will the province outline how it will handle FIT program?

The Large Feed-in Tariff (FIT) program is being replaced with a new competitive procurement process for renewable energy projects.  We asked the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) to develop a new competitive procurement process for future renewable energy projects larger than 500 kW, which will take into account local needs and considerations before contracts are offered.

The OPA has engaged with the public, municipalities, Aboriginal communities and other stakeholders to help inform the identification of appropriate locations and siting requirements for future renewable energy projects.  The OPA has reported back to the government with interim recommendations and additional engagement activities will occur later this year.

We need to make sure our approach is balanced and considers the views of local communities while ensuring the long-term sustainability of Ontario’s electricity system. We expect to have more information on this once the province has updated its Long-Term Energy Plan later this year.

Is it deliberately ignoring those opposed to wind energy projects?

We’re moving forward with renewable energy in a balanced (way).  We listened very extensively to the public and we’re changing the way we procure renewable energy projects to respond to community concerns while continuing to encourage a strong renewable energy sector in this province.

Will the government return planning authority to municipalities on Green projects?

The Ontario government is making key changes to increase local control over the siting of renewable energy projects. As a former Mayor and Regional Chair, I understand how important it is for communities to be involved in decision making from the beginning.

Our government wants to ensure that future renewable energy projects will be built in the right place at the right time. That’s why we are replacing the current Feed-in-Tariff program for large renewable energy projects with a competitive bidding process, tailored to the needs of communities. Potential developers will need to work directly with municipalities to determine appropriate locations and site requirements for any future large renewable energy project.

Our government will also provide up to $90,000 for municipalities to develop Municipal Energy Plans. These plans will help municipalities better integrate energy, infrastructure, growth and land use planning to support economic development, increase conservation and identify energy opportunities.

Finally, we’ll work with municipalities to determine a property tax rate increase for wind turbine towers.

If municipalities declare themselves “Not Willing Hosts” is it a guarantee there will not be wind energy projects in their municipalities in the future?

Recent changes will ensure that municipalities have more say over renewable energy projects.  Through the priority points system municipalities will have increased influence over the siting of projects through the prioritization of applications that have demonstrated municipal support.  Developers that work closely with municipalities and have broader support will receive points during the application process, helping those projects move forward.  During the recent round of Small FIT contract awards, over 98 percent of the successful applications received municipal council support resolutions.

These recent changes also gives municipalities more tools and enables them to participate directly in the FIT program

Municipal energy plans will give municipalities a much stronger role in identifying local energy needs and opportunities. Municipal Energy Plans are comprehensive strategies to align infrastructure, energy and land use planning.

The competitive procurement process will ensure that renewable energy developers work directly with municipalities, before contracts are awarded, and that large renewable energy generation is targeted regionally, based on system needs.  This process will better integrate renewable energy into our communities and economy, encouraging growth in the renewable energy sector and respecting communities.

Will there be a moratorium on the [wind] current projects until the two-year federal health effects study is complete as many municipalities have asked?

The government is committed to protecting the health of residents in communities that are home to renewable energy projects.  We have taken a cautious approach when setting standards for wind turbine setbacks and noise limits to protect Ontarians.

Large-scale wind energy projects in Ontario are subject to the Renewable Energy Approval (REA) regulation, which includes minimum setbacks for wind energy projects, and minimum requirements for environmental studies and community consultation activities.  Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Arlene King undertook a review of the potential health effects of wind turbines. Her 2010 report stated that there is no scientific evidence to date to support claims that wind turbine noise cause adverse health effects.

The Ministry of the Environment continues to review emerging scientific, health, acoustics and engineering studies to ensure Ontario’s REA regulation remains in line with the latest and best in science. The ministry also continues to support further research by funding, through an agreement with the Council of Ontario Universities, a Research Chair for the ongoing study of Renewable Energy Technologies and Health.

 

 

7 Responses to “Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli answers turbine questions”

  1. Sandy from Belwood

    Gee….do you think any politician can directly answer a question. Just more BS.

    Reply
  2. Steve Hasbury

    A lot of non-answers here. I have repeatedly asked Minister Chiarelli and Premier Wynne what the government intends to do to help those of us whose health and property values are negatively impacted by the installation of wind turbines. I have not received an answer. This a question that everyone affected should be asking – repeatedly and relentlessly – until an answer is forthcoming.
    The fact that they still refer to Arlene King’s so-called review indicates that they refuse to look at all the new evidence and information that continues to emerge.
    This refusal to acknowledge the facts will not bode well for them when the avalanche of lawsuits finally lands on them. I would also suggest that criminal charges will be appropriate.

    Reply
  3. BB

    What a total crock. …carefully worded bafflegab. They have given out 14 more wind approvals since Wynn said she would not force them into communities. Some as recent as 2 weeks agao. Many went into communities that had already declared themselves unwilling hosts.
    The point system was supposed to be in place then, but didn’t stop them from proceeding without councils support. Anyone in rural areas feel like the OPA has engaged them in conversation lately?

    Reply
  4. Just an Observer

    When the wind farms were first proposed were the municipality’s and township’s given the opportunity to constuct them and operate them much like a utility? I think of all the rural telephone company’s in Ontario that are owned locally by co-op’s or the customers. Now that First Nations are permitted to put up some large scale wind farms on their lands and some local co-ops are now given the chance to establish 50MW projects are their opportunities for Municipality’s and Township’s to establish wind farms for the benefit of their residence.

    Reply
  5. Donna St. John

    On the surface, Mr. Charelli has tried to make it appear that his government cares about engaging local input but if you read between the lines if is clear that this is just more lip service to make it look like they are making meaningful changes. Its “cut and paste” with a few new spins. The Liberal Government’s agenda remains unchanged: To shove as many Industrial Wind Turbines into rural Ontario anywhere and any way it can at the tax payers expense. I took part in the OPA study… it was bias and it was insulting. The questions did not allow for open, honest communication with local communities. It was rammed through the system at lightning speed to check another Liberal “process” box. The GEA is a sham and the Liberals are pretending to do something about it. Everyone knows it!

    Reply
  6. Anne Johnston

    As disappointing as I expected. That Dr. Arlene King is STILL being quoted as an expert in the health issue is crazy. There is now evidence available from all over the world that turbines and people don’t co-exist in a healthy fashion.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>